Developing interventions through partnership with community members

Authors

  • Kate Greenwell Primary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, UK
  • Sarah Denford Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, and the School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol in collaboration with UK Health Security Agency
  • Ingrid Muller Primary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, University of Southampton, UK
  • Ben Ainsworth School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, UK
  • Leanne Tucker Public contributor
  • Lucy Yardley School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK and The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol in collaboration with UK Health Security Agency and the School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62696/t4jbbw75

Abstract

Interventions are increasingly being co-produced in partnership with people from the communities who will use them. This can help to ensure interventions are appropriate for and valued by these communities. This article describes how our research team has implemented the methods and tools of the widely used Person-Based Approach to integrate co-production into the heart of our intervention development. We describe a series of case studies and consider how traditional engagement approaches may be complemented with approaches that better suit the needs and preferences of those from underserved communities. We consider the benefits and limitations of each co-production approach and propose a range of tools (e.g. table of changes, planning table, guiding principles) to support co-production. We conclude by highlighting that collaborating with intervention users requires flexibility in engagement efforts to facilitate meaningful partnerships at all stages of intervention development. We also advocate working with community partners to agree on an approach that supports both research requirements and reflects their needs and preferences.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-22

Issue

Section

Original Articles